CFP for special issue of Medieval Feminist Forum: Women’s Arts of the Body
Edited by Irina Dumitrescu (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn)
Email: irinaalexandradumitrescu (at) gmail.com
At the beginning of Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy, Philosophy arrives to drive out the Muses from Boethius’ cell. It is often said that the Philosophy is female because Latin philosophia is a feminine noun, and, indeed, the dialogue that follows continues a masculine tradition of inquiry and authorship. And yet, woven into this scene are not only female figures, but traces of women’s craft. Philosophy is a cloth-maker, having woven her own clothes, the Muses are described as actresses and whores, and both Muses and Philosophy aim to cure the sick Boethius with their healing arts. Although the dialogue that follows aims to teach the ailing man how to distance himself from worldly things, it begins with feminine craft and arts of the body.
For a special issue of Medieval Feminist Forum, contributions are invited that reflect on arts of the body associated in with women at any given point or place in the Middle Ages (with some flexibility towards the Renaissance). Such “arts of the body” might include: spinning and weaving; needlework, knitting, sewing, quilting; cooking, baking, confectionery; brewing, distilling; pottery; cosmetics, hair-dressing; dancing, singing, acting; medicine, home-remedies, first aid; making perfumes and poisons; birth control, abortion, midwifery; sex-work.
Some questions you might consider include:
– Which arts of the body are associated with women or men, and when?
– In what cases do arts or crafts that had belonged to women become the purview of men, or vice versa?
– How do women’s arts of the body intersect with race, class, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability?
– How are women’s arts of the body appropriated as metaphors for men’s work?
– When does women’s work count as work? When does women’s art count as art?
– What biases do we find against feminine arts of the body, and how are they expressed in texts?
– Under what historical circumstances do feminine “arts of the body” make it onto the books? When are they institutionally recognized, inscribed, recorded, or even just mentioned?
– What effects do we notice due to the lack of a historical record? What kind of reconstruction or myth-making fills the archival gap?
– How have women’s arts of the body been taught or passed down? What can be recovered about women’s teaching practices?
– What kinds of gendered spaces are created or used for women’s arts of the body?
– What interpretative or historical tools can be used to recover and/or reconstruct lost arts of the body?
Full-length scholarly essays are welcomed from any discipline, and will undergo peer review. Also welcome for this issue are shorter creative or experimental pieces addressing the issue topic. Please submit an abstract or proposal (250 words maximum) for either kind of work by August 1, 2016 to irinaalexandradumitrescu (at) gmail.com .
Please feel free to get in touch via email if you have any questions about the topic or the feasibility of a particular approach or format.
August 1, 2016 – Abstract deadline
September 1, 2016 – Essays solicited
January 1, 2017 – Drafts of solicited essays due
May 1, 2017 – Final drafts of accepted essays due
Fall 2017 – Projected publication date